Wednesday, May 29, 2013

WHY IS THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION THROTTLING SOCIAL WELFARE ORGANIZATIONS …?


Scandal draws questions about IRS role in enforcing Obamacare

Rally outside IRS building in Washington, DC
Tea Party supporters rally in front of the IRS building May 21, 2013 in Washington, D.C., to protest the abuse of power from the IRS in targeting tea party and grassroots organizations for harassment. | Olivier Douliery/MCT
Social Welfare Organizations

To be tax-exempt as a social welfare organization described in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 501(c)(4), an organization must not be organized for profit and must be operated exclusively to promote social welfare. The earnings of a section 501(c)(4) organization may not inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If the organization engages in an excess benefit transaction with a person having substantial influence over the organization, an excise tax may be imposed on the person and any managers agreeing to the transaction. See Introduction to IRC 4958 for more information about this excise tax. For a more detailed discussion of the exemption requirements for section 501(c)(4) organizations, see IRC 501(c)(4) Organizations. For more information about applying for exemption, see Application for Recognition of Exemption.

To be operated exclusively to promote social welfare, an organization must operate primarily to further the common good and general welfare of the people of the community (such as by bringing about civic betterment and social improvements). For example, an organization that restricts the use of its facilities to employees of selected corporations and their guests is primarily benefiting a private group rather than the community and, therefore, does not qualify as a section 501(c)(4) organization. Similarly, an organization formed to represent member-tenants of an apartment complex does not qualify, because its activities benefit the member-tenants and not all tenants in the community, while an organization formed to promote the legal rights of all tenants in a particular community may qualify under section 501(c)(4) as a social welfare organization. An organization is not operated primarily for the promotion of social welfare if its primary activity is operating a social club for the benefit, pleasure or recreation of its members, or is carrying on a business with the general public in a manner similar to organizations operated for profit link].

Seeking legislation germane to the organization's programs is a permissible means of attaining social welfare purposes. Thus, a section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization may further its exempt purposes through lobbying as its primary activity without jeopardizing its exempt status. An organization that has lost its section 501(c)(3) status due to substantial attempts to influence legislation may not thereafter qualify as a section 501(c)(4) organization. In addition, a section 501(c)(4) organization that engages in lobbying may be required to either provide notice to its members regarding the percentage of dues paid that are applicable to lobbying activities or pay a proxy tax. For more information, see Lobbying Issues .
The promotion of social welfare does not include direct or indirect participation or intervention in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. However, a section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization may engage in some political activities, so long as that is not its primary activity. However, any expenditure it makes for political activities may be subject to tax under section 527(f). For further information regarding political and lobbying activities of section 501(c) organizations, see Election Year Issues, Political Campaign and Lobbying Activities of IRC 501(c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(6) Organizations, and Revenue Ruling 2004-6.
Additional information


WASHINGTON — The blossoming IRS scandal over the targeting of conservative groups is provoking new scrutiny and terse questions about the agency’s role in shaping and implementing the controversial new national health care law, with the biggest changes set to begin next year.


The Internal Revenue Service is an critical aspect in the compliance (implementation) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, commonly shorthanded as Obamacare. The tax agency must act on 47 provisions of the new law, more than half of those already in effect, including the more controversial ones taking effect in 2014 such as the requirement that nearly all non-elderly adults have health care coverage.
The IRS role in Obamacare hadn’t been particularly controversial until May 10, when it was revealed that an IRS office targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status as social welfare organizations.
“The IRS is charge with compliance (of administering) throughout tax penalties in some of the most important elements of Obamacare.  [REMEMBER THE TITLE OF THE LAW: PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT OF 2010, NOW TRY AND GET YOUR ARMS AROUND THIS LAW … ITS FOR YOUR BENEFIT.]
IRS starts by probing into the personal affairs of Americans  with invasive and personal questions to determine (of course the IRS will determine) the consequences for non-compliance. The IRS, further will have broad discretion to define "exactly" what constitutes non-compliance, by the way.
THE IRS IS THE GOVERNMENT'S RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION 
The recent and continuing scandal over how the IRS granted tax-exempt status also has dented the perception that the agency operates as a neutral, nonpartisan player. The issue is "TRUST" … not to mention character if such a word can ever be used with such an organization.  Nonetheless, “Are they competent to do it? Are they trustworthy enough?” 
Many stoked fears by warning that the IRS was granted access to sensitive medical records and would peer into the private lives of citizens. [HIPPA LAWS]
The IRS received about $881 million over the last four years to implement the health care law. Some of the changes the IRS must enact include: [CAN YOU RECALL THE TITLE OF THE LAW?]
  • – Impose fines on employers with 50 workers or more that do not offer health care coverage for full-time employees, or meet other criteria.
  • – Provide refundable tax credits for companies with fewer than 25 workers that do provide health care coverage.
  • – Provide help for lower-income taxpayers who purchase health insurance from a newly created state-run exchange.
  • – Develop criteria for taxing qualified individuals who don’t purchase health insurance as required.
  • – Levy a 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax on unearned income for wealthier seniors, starting in 2013.
  • With more than 48 million Americans without health coverage, the health care law is designed to move them into the pool of self-purchased health care coverage. The IRS next year will begin giving a subsidy through tax credits or levying tax penalties on individuals and employers, both carrot and stick. It’ll offer tax credits for some individuals and smaller employers and tax penalties for non-compliance. Adding to the complexity, it’s first year, in 2014, will be based not on the prior year’s income but rather on income earned in 2014, with an adjustment to subsidies or penalties in 2015.

“It will be a pain in the neck for the IRS because it’s figuring out what the subsidy is for your income two years ago,” Williams said.
For Americans whose health insurance coverage now comes through their or their spouse’s employer – 155.5 million individuals in 2011, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute – the IRS is already collecting health care information.
It showed up in their W-2 statement on their 2012 income, in Box 12 with the letters DD. The amount in that box marked DD represented the value of their employer-provided health coverage. In 2018, some part of high-value health plans will be subject to taxation.