Thursday, October 31, 2013

GOOGLE USING NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR UNDERWATER GLOBAL NETWORKING ... AND COMMUNICATIONS ... CHEAPER THAN SATELLITES

WOW ... Coast Guard cover story on Google's Mystery Barges ... oh, please don't insult our intelligence!

 
A WHITER SHADE OF PALE ... 
Computerworld — The U.S. Coast Guard has given up what could be a key clue in the tale of two mysterious barges moored on either side of the country.

Does Google's Floating Data Center Plan Hold Water?

After repeatedly declining to comment about the barges, which appear to be carrying structures made of shipping crates and are docked in the harbors in both San Francisco and Portland, Me., a Coast Guard spokesman divulged some information today, according to a CNBC.com report.

"We can confirm that Google is involved or associated with the barge, but there is a nondisclosure agreement in effect; the Coast Guard is unable to discuss or divulge any further details at this time," said Petty Officer 1st Class Thomas McKenzie, a Coast Guard spokesman.
Google has not returned repeated requests for information about the mystery barges.

These shipping containers piled on top of a barge in Portland, Maine, could be a Google floating data center, although the Internet company won't say. A similar barge is docked in San Francisco Bay. (Photo: Sharon Gaudin/Computerworld)

A Coast Guard spokesman stationed in Portland, Me. said earlier today that the captain of the station knows what's on the barge but most others there do not. The company behind the barrages has asked the Coast Guard not to talk about it because of proprietary concerns, he added.

The spokesman told Computerworld that work is not expected to begin on the barge in Portland until work is completed on the one in San Francisco.

The two barges have led to a lot of curiosity and speculation, much of it because of the heavy veil of secrecy around them.

Both are owned by By and Large, LLC, a company formed in 2012 in Delaware but with no known address or phone number.

Everyone from harbor masters to city workers to tugboat operators have either said they were never told what's on the barges, what they are intended for or whether Google is involved - or they simply won't say.

On Tuesday, Pete Vigue, CEO of The Cianbro Co., which has the construction contract for the barge docked in Portland, said he is working under a strict non-disclosure agreement.

Much of the speculation swirled around Google being the mysterious entity behind the floating structures. Some speculated that Google is building floating data centers, Apple-like Google retail stores or even Google Glass stores. Most think Google is trying out floating data centers, which the company got a patent for in 2009.

A PILE OF CRAP ... SUCH A STORY!

The floating data center, according to the patent, would be fueled by motion-powered, floating machines arranged in a grid and wired together. The machines, such as those built by Pelamis Wave Power Ltd in Edinburgh, Scotland, capture the natural motion of the waves, tides and current and convert it into electricity or pumping power for the data center's cooling pumps.

"It's not that far fetched," David Cappuccio, a vice president and chief of research at Gartner Inc., said in an earlier interview. "You have to be somebody of Google's size to even consider this."

Sharon Gaudin covers the Internet and Web 2.0, emerging technologies, and desktop and laptop chips for Computerworld. Follow Sharon on Twitter at @sgaudin, on Google+ or subscribe to Sharon's RSS feed. Her email address issgaudin@computerworld.com.













NO GOOD DEED SHALL GO UNPUNISHED ... AND THEN NO GOOD DEED SHALL GO UNPUNISHED

 When the Catholic Church was founded, there were no hospitals. Today, one out of five people in this country receive their medical care at a Catholic hospital.
When the Catholic Church was founded, there were no schools. Today, the Catholic Church teaches 3 million students a day, in its more than 250 Catholic Colleges and Universities, in its more than 1200 Catholic High Schools and its more than 5000 Catholic grade schools.

Every day, the Catholic Church feeds, clothes, shelters and educates more people than any other organization in the world.

The new Obama Health Mandate could end all this and the tax payers would have to make up the loss.


Also, all Catholic adoption services would come to an end; a human disaster.

There are more than 77 million Catholics in this country. It takes an estimated 50 million Catholic votes to elect a president. I am asking all of you to go to the polls in 2014 and be united in replacing all Senators and Reps with someone who will respect the Catholic Church, all Christians, and all Religions with the exception of Islam.

**Mr. President, you said**, "The USA is not a Christian Nation". You are wrong,  we are a Christian Nation founded on Judeo-Christian values allowing all religions in America to Worship & Practice Freely. Something Islam will never do.

 
Oh, by the way, on MUSLIM HERITAGE IN America ...

Have you ever been to a Muslim hospital?

Have you heard a Muslim orchestra?

Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade?

Have you witnessed a Muslim charity?

Have you seen Muslims shaking hands with a Muslim Girl Scouts?

Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper?

Have you ever seen a Muslim do anything that contributes positively to the  American way of life?


PERHAPS 'THEY' PROVIDED THE FASHION STATEMENT OF THE KKK

NOT EVERYTHING MADE IN THE USA IS ... WELL THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS



I THINK I WAS AN AMERICAN BEFORE I WAS ADOPTED AND AN INDONESIAN CITIZEN ... FOREIGN EXCHANGE STUDENT ...








THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZER BLAME GAME ... THREE DAY OLD FISH ... AND THE PROMISE LAND

Obama blames ‘bad apple insurers’ for canceled insurance plans



B.O., BOY DOES THIS STINK!

The Pinocchio Test

The Obama administration is defending its pledge with a rather slim reed — that there is nothing in the law that makes insurance companies force people out of plans they were enrolled in before the law passed. That explanation conveniently ignores the regulations written by the administration to implement the law. Moreover, it also ignores the fact that the purpose of the law was to bolster coverage and mandate a robust set of benefits, whether someone wanted to pay for it or not.
The Obama’s statements were sweeping and unequivocal — and made both before and after the bill became law. The White House now cites technicalities to avoid admitting that he went too far in his repeated pledge, which, after all, is one of the most famous statements of his presidency.
The Obamacare’s promise apparently came with a very large caveat: “If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan — if we deem it to be adequate.”
President Obama tried a new tack Wednesday as he fought back against criticism of his Obamacare claims.
ALL ABOARD ... NEXT STOP BANKRUPTCY

THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG
"One of the things health reform was designed to do was to help not only the uninsured but also the under-insured," Obama said. "And there are a number of Americans, fewer than 5 percent of Americans, who've got cut-rate plans that don't offer real financial protection in the event of a serious illness or an accident. Fact-checkers and journalists have ruled that Obama wasn't being truthful when he claimed that people who liked their insurance could keep it. Obama during a speech in Boston sought to cast the issue Wednesday as trying to weed out "bad apple insurers" who don't provide enough coverage. [INSURANCE HAS BEEN SOLD FOR MANY YEARS IN AN FLEXIBLE FASHION ... CONTRACTING FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE YOU NEED, WANT AND PARTICULARLY WHAT YOU CAN AFFORD, CHOICES, OUTCOMES, RISKS ... ISN'T THAT WHAT "INSURANCE" IS ALL ABOUT!]
"Remember, before the Obamacare, these bad apple insurers had free rein every single year to limit the care that you received or used minor pre-existing conditions to jack up your premiums or bill you into bankruptcy."
DON'T YOU THINK IF I WERE WRONG I'D KNOW IT?
Obama also said that he is responsible for fixing the HealthCare.gov Web site -- even as Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius said earlier in the day that Obama isn't responsible for the botched Obamacare exchanges rollout.
THE WEB SITE IS A SYMPTOM NOT THE CAUSE
"Right now, the Web site is too slow, too many people have gotten stuck, and I am not happy about it," Obama said at a speech in Boston promoting the similar Massachusetts health-care law.
Obama added: "So there's no excuse for it, and I take full responsibility for making sure it gets fixed ASAP."
The administration has set a late November deadline for fixing the Web site.
At a hearing earlier Wednesday, Sebelius said she and her department were responsible for the Obamacare rollout's failings, not Obama.
DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO ... IS THIS A NO SMOKING AREA?
"No, sir," Sebelius said when asked directly whether Obama is responsible. "We are responsible for the rollout."
YOU MAKE ME WISH I HAD MORE MIDDLE FINGERS












Wednesday, October 30, 2013

WTF ... THAT'S NOT SHIT ... IT'S USED FOOD ...

Top Democrat says those aren't 'cancellation notices,' they're 'transitions' into ObamaScare

Insurance companies aren't sending out cancellation letters, they're helping people "transition" into ObamaScare, according to a top Democrat. 
YUP, USED FOOD!
"If [the companies] changed [the insurance plans] then they have to notify the people who have to have the opportunity to have another policy," said House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Sander Levin, D-Mich.
SENATOR LEVIN ... FROM DETROIT, MICHIGAN 
In fact, according to Levin, the "so-called cancellation notices" merely "help people transition to a new policy."
Levin cited comments made by Florida Blue CEO Patrick Geraghty, the insurance company executive who originally floated the "transitioning" talking point on Sunday's Meet the Press. 

JUST TRANSITIONING TO THE SHOWERS
"We're not cutting people, we're actually transitioning people," Geraghty told NBC's David Gregory. "What we've been doing is informing folks that their plan doesn't meet the test of the essential health benefits, therefore they have a choice of many options that we make available through the exchange."

Geraghty's argument may exonerate Florida Blue, but the fig leaf doesn't cover Obamacare nearly as well as Levin suggested, given that "the test of the essential health benefits" comes from Obamacare and invalidated the previously acceptable insurance policies.











Tuesday, October 29, 2013

PIMPS, PREACHERS AND POLITICIANS ... WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

Obama administration's pimps and preachers knew millions would be screwed with their exiting health insurance ... can't keep it ... 
we just told you want you wanted to hear!
President Barack Obama delivers remarks about the ObamaCare (Affordable Care Act) in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington on Oct. 1, 2013.
By Lisa Myers and Hannah Rappleye, NBC News
President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after ObamaCare (Affordable Care Act) became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under ObamaCare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.
"grab your ankles cancellation" TRANSLATION: THE KISS OFF
Four sources deeply involved in the ObamaCare (Affordable Care Act) tell NBC News that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “grab your ankles cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by ObamaCare. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”
 
TRUST ME, JUST THINK ABOUT THE SAVING AND INCREASED COVERAGE NOT TO MENTION THE FACT YOU CAN KEEP YOUR CURRENT DOCTOR'S ... 
None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration's pimps and preachers. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date -- the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example -- the policy would not be grandfathered.

Buried in ObamaCare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”  
That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them.
Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” was still saying in 2012, “If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”
“This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn’t keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn’t make it either,” said  Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today.
The White House does not dispute that many in the individual market will lose their current coverage, but argues they will be offered better coverage in its place, and that many will get tax subsidies that would offset any increased costs.
“One of the main goals of the law is to ensure that people have insurance they can rely on – that doesn’t discriminate or charge more based on pre-existing conditions.  The consumers who are getting notices are in plans that do not provide all these protections – but in the vast majority of cases, those same insurers will automatically shift their enrollees to a plan that provides new consumer protections and, for nearly half of individual market enrollees, discounts through premium tax credits,” said White House spokesperson Jessica Santillo.
“Nothing in ObamaCare forces people out of their health plans: The law allows plans that covered people at the time the law was enacted to continue to offer that same coverage to the same enrollees – nothing has changed and that coverage can continue into 2014,” she said.
ObamaCare will not affect most traditional employer-based plans, but many of those who purchased insurance policies on their own will see higher premiums. This is in part due to the 10 essential health benefits insurance providers are now required to include. NBC's Peter Alexander reports.
Individual insurance plans with low premiums often lack basic benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, or carry high deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. ObamaCare requires all companies to offer more benefits, such as mental health care, and also bars companies from denying coverage for preexisting conditions.  ObamaCare is designed to make human life "as we know it" obsolete.
Today, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked about the president’s promise that consumers would be able to keep their health care. “What the president said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by ObamaCare to create minimum standards of coverage, minimum services that every insurance plan has to provide,” Carney said. “So it's true that there are existing healthcare plans on the individual market that don't meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the ObamaCare.”  The Crucifixion of the American public is ObamaCare.



Other experts said that most consumers in the individual market will not be able to keep their policies. Nancy Thompson, senior vice president of CBIZ Benefits, which helps companies manage their employee benefits, says numbers in this market are hard to pin down, but that data from states and carriers suggests “anywhere from 50 to 75 percent” of individual policy holders will get cancellation letters. Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who chairs the health committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, says that estimate is “probably about right.” She added that a few states are asking insurance companies to cancel and replace policies, rather than just amend them, to avoid confusion.
A spokesman for America's Health Plans says there are no precise numbers on how many will receive cancellations letters or get notices that their current policies don’t meet ObamaCare standards. In both cases, consumers will not be able to keep their current coverage.

SELF-PITY
Those getting the cancellation letters are often shocked and unhappy.
George Schwab, 62, of North Carolina, said he was "perfectly happy" with his plan from Blue Cross Blue Shield, which also insured his wife for a $228 monthly premium. But this past September, he was surprised to receive a letter saying his policy was no longer available. The "comparable" plan the insurance company offered him carried a $1,208 monthly premium and a $5,500 deductible.
And the best option he’s found on the exchange so far offered a 415 percent jump in premium, to $948 a month.
"The deductible is less," he said, "But the plan doesn't meet my needs. Its unaffordable."

"I'm sitting here looking at this, thinking we ought to just pay the fine and just get insurance when we're sick," Schwab added. "Everybody's worried about whether the website works or not, but that's fixable. That's just the tip of the iceberg. This stuff isn't fixable."

Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, is raising a new baby while running her own PR firm. She said she received a letter last July from Cigna, her insurance company, that said the company would no longer offer her individual plan, and promised to send a letter by October offering a comparable option. So far, she hasn't received anything.

"I'm completely overwhelmed with a six-month-old and a business,” said Goldwater. “The last thing I can do is spend hours poring over a website that isn't working, trying to wrap my head around this entire health care overhaul."
Goldwater said she supports the new law and is grateful for provisions helping folks like her with pre-existing conditions, but she worries she won’t be able to afford the new insurance, which is expected to cost more because it has more benefits. "I'm jealous of people who have really good health insurance," she said. "It's people like me who are stuck in the middle who are going to get screwed."

Richard Helgren, a Lansing, Mich., retiree, said he was “irate” when he received a letter informing him that his wife Amy's $559 a month health plan was being changed because of the law. The plan the insurer offered raised his deductible from $0 to $2,500, and the company gave him 17 days to decide.

The higher costs spooked him and his wife, who have painstakingly planned for their retirement years. "Every dollar we didn't plan for erodes our standard of living," Helgren said.

Ulltimately, though Helgren opted not to shop through the ObamaCare exchanges, he was able to apply for a good plan with a slightly lower premium through an insurance agent.

He said he never believed President Obama’s promise that people would be able to keep their current plans.

"I heard him only about a thousand times," he said. "I didn't believe him when he said it though because there was just no way that was going to happen. They wrote the regulations so strictly that none of the old polices can grandfather."
For months, Laszewski has warned that some consumers will face sticker shock. He recently got his own notice that he and his wife cannot keep their current policy, which he described as one of the best, so-called "Cadillac" plans offered for 2013. Now, he said, the best comparable plan he found for 2014 has a smaller doctor network, larger out-of-pocket costs, and a 66 percent premium increase.

“Mr. President, I like the coverage I have," Laszweski said. "It is the best health insurance policy you can buy."


















CRYSTAL BALL, TARO CARDS, PHRENOLOGY

This was 47 years ago. April 3, 1965. An amazing prediction.
Do you remember the famous ABC radio commentator Paul Harvey?
Millions of Americans listened to his programs which were broadcast over 1,200 radio stations nationwide.
When you listen to this, remember the commentary was broadcast 47 years ago on April 3, 1965.

It's short...less than three minutes. You will be amazed.

OBAMACARE, BLACK PLAGUE, ORGANIZED IGNORANCE AND MAMBO NO. 5 ...

OBAMACARE DOES NOT INVOLVE  CHOICE ... IT CODIFIES A NEW REALITY, A NEW ENVIRONMENT (SOCIAL CONTRACT) THAT SATURATES YOUR WHOLE FIELD OF BEING.  ONE CAN PERCEIVE IT ONLY AFTER ALIENATION ... OR RATHER SOME DEGREE OF ALIENATION.  I CAN SWALLOW THE SALIVA IN MY MOUTH ... BECAUSE IT'S "ME", BUT I CAN NOT SWALLOW IT IF I PUT IT FIRST IN A GLASS ... AS A FISH KNOWS NOT ABOUT WATER UNTIL IT'S LANDED.  TRANSLATION: I CAN'T SMELL MYSELF BUT WRAPPED IN OBAMACARE I STINK!

MAMBO NO. 5 ... LET'S DANCE TO THE END ... 
New York doctors are treating ObamaCare like the plague, a new survey reveals.
A poll conducted by the New York State Medical Society finds that 44 percent of MDs said they are not participating in the nation’s new health-care plan.
Another 33 percent say they’re still not sure whether to become ObamaCare providers.
Only 23 percent of the 409 physicians queried said they’re taking patients who signed up through health exchanges.
“This is so poorly designed that a lot of doctors are afraid to participate,” said Dr. Sam Unterricht, president of the 29,000-member organization. “There’s a lot of resistance. Doctors don’t know what they’re going to get paid.” [Mambo No. 5]
Three out of four doctors who are participating in the program said they “had to participate” because of existing contractual obligations with an insurer or medical provider, not because they wanted to.
Only one in four “affirmatively” chose to sign up for the exchanges.
Nearly eight in 10 — 77 percent — said they had not been given a fee schedule to show much they’ll get paid if they sign up.
The survey invited doctors to anonymously share opinions about the new health care law, and many took time out of their busy days to vent.
“Obama Care wants to start right away, but who see all these new patients???? Not me,” e-mailed one doc.
Another said, “I plan to retire if this disaster is implemented. This is a train wreck.” [to Mambo No. 5]
“I refuse to participate in the exchange plans! I am completely opposed to this new law,” said a third respondent.
One doctor recycled the mantra used to attack addictions: “The solution is simple: Just say no.” [and dance to Mambo No. 5]
One physician was so disgusted, he threatened to taken only cash patients going forward.
“I am seriously considering opting out of all insurance plans including Medicare because of [ObamaCare].”
Some physicians said the pressure on insurance carriers to control costs is leading to rationed care.
“OBAMACARE is a disaster. I have already seen denial of medication, denial of referrals,” one doc said.
And they worry that stingy payments for medical services offered by insurers could put some doctors out of business and force others into retirement.
“Any doctor who accepts the exchange is just a bad businessman/woman. Pays terrible,” argued one doctor.
Said another MD, “Can’t imagine any doctors would be willing to work for so little money? All doctors should boycott.” [Mambo No. 5 ]
Doctors complained they’ve gotten the shaft for years even before ObamaCare.
DANCING TO MAMBO NO. 5 ... DOWN THE ROAD TO HELL
“I get screwed from insurance companies already. I refuse to get screwed any longer,” one doctor said.

Others said they don’t have enough information to make an informed choice.
This is a joke. We are flying blind,” said one doctor.














Monday, October 28, 2013

OBAMACARE A VALUE JUDGEMENT DEVOID OF ANY HEALTH VALUE ... ITS BECOME A VOICE OF GRIEVANCE

THE TROUBLE WITH OBAMACARE IS THAT IT DOESN'T INVOLVE: IT LEAVES NO ROOM FOR PARTICIPATION; IT'S ADDRESSED NOT TO CONSUIMER, NOR CO-PRODUCER.  THE ONLY MESSAGE THAT THEY GENERALLY COME AWAY WITH IS A SENSE OF FAILURE. WHAT IT OFFERS, I BELIEVE, IS A SUDDEN INSIGHT, AN UNEXPECTED GLIMPSE INTO A NEW REALITY THAT, AT MOST, WAS MERELY SUSPECTED BUT NEVER BEFORE SEEN WITH SUCH CLARITY. OBAMACARE IS A DISLOCATION ON MANY LEVELS.




THE FRANKENSTEIN OF AMERICA ... THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT

BERNIE MADOFF observed that the US public is deft, dumb and blind as they are lead by the power of their illusion of need, rather than power of his greed.  

This is not conjecture, but fact. Links to verify this article are included.
WHO LOOKS OUTSIDE, DREAMS;
WHO LOOKS INSIDE, AWAKENS
.

-- CARL GUSTAV JUNG

The OBAMA ADMINISTRATION has entered into a contract with a real estate firm to sell 56 buildings that currently house U.S. Post Offices. The government has decided it no longer needs these buildings, most of which are located on prime land in towns and cities across the country. The sale of these properties will fetch about $19 billion.
OK, OK, ... NEW CATEGORY INCOMPETENTLY CORRUPT


A regular real estate commission will be paid to the company that was given the exclusive listing for handling the sales. That company is CRI and it belongs to a man named Richard Blum.

RICHARD BLUM

Richard Blum is the husband of Senator Dianne Feinstein. (Most voters and many of the government people who approved the deal have not made the connection between the two because they have different last names).
SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN
Senator Feinstein and her husband stand to make a fortune (estimated at between $950 million and $1.1 billion!!) from these transactions. His company is the sole real estate agent on the sale. CRI will be making a minimum of 3% and as much as 6% commission on each and every sale. 
All of the properties that are being sold are all fully paid for. They were purchased with U.S. taxpayers dollars. The U.S.P.S. is allowed free and clear, tax exempt use. The only cost to keep them open is the cost to actually keep the doors open and the heat and lights on. The United States Postal Service doesn't even have to pay county property taxes on these subject properties. Would you put your house in foreclosure just because you couldn't afford to pay the electric bill?
Well, the folks in Washington have given the Post Office the OK to do it! Worse yet, most of the net proceeds of the sales will go back to the U.S.P.S, an organization that is so poorly managed that they have lost $117 billion dollars in the past 10 years!

No one in the mainstream media is even raising an eyebrow over the conflict of interest and on the possibility of corruption on the sale of billions of dollars worth of public assets.

How does a U.S. Senator from San Francisco manage to get away with organizing and lobbying such a sweet deal? Has our government become so elitist that they have no fear of oversight?

And it's no mere coincidence that these two public service crooks have different last names; a feeble attempt at avoiding transparency in these type of transactions.

MEDIA NOT INTERESTED OF COURSE

Bob: "Hey Jim, did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?,
Jim: "You mean the Mexican gun running?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean SEAL Team 6?"
Bob: "No, the other one."Jim: "Obama saying the avg family would save $2,500 on their premiums?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Forcing businesses to violate their religious beliefs by paying for drugs that abort the unborn?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Violating the rights and sanctity of our Churches?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Spending $634 million on a website that doesn't work?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Obama calling for an increase in our debt when he lambasted Bush for the very same thing?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Obama having NSA spy on 124 Billion Phone Calls in One Month?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Saddling our kids with $17 trillion in debt of which they can
never get out of and will not have as good a life as we have?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Bailing out Detroit after decades of corrupt Democratic management?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean the State Dept. lying about Benghazi?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean voter fraud?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Intentionally trying to hurt Americans during the sequester?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Blocking veterans who secured our freedoms from their monuments
but giving the green light for Illegals to use Monument Mall?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Denying school kids the ability to tour the White House but still spending lavishly on his parties?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean Obama saying we can keep our insurance and doctors if we wanted to?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The NSA monitoring foreign diplomats?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean the use of drones in our own country without the benefit of the law?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million and right after it declared bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean the president arming the Muslim Brotherhood?"
Bob: "No the other one:.
Jim: "The IRS targeting conservatives?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The DOJ spying on the press?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Sebelius shaking down health insurance executives?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "You mean Obama spending $3.7 Trillion on Welfare Over Last 5 Years"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Giving SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and 3 months later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails and everything else?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Millions of Americans losing their health care coverage?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Forcing Americans to include coverage in their insurance policies of items they do not want?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Ordering the release of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants from jails and prisons, and falsely blaming the sequester?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Denying Arizona the right to protect its borders?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Providing weapons to Syrian rebels many of whom apparently are Al Queda"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The president's repeated violation of the law requiring him to submit a
budget no later than the first Monday in February?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The 2012 vote where 115% of all registered voters in some counties voted 100% for Obama?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The president's unconstitutional recess appointments in an attempt to circumvent the Senate's advise-and-consent role?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The State Department interfering with an Inspector General investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "Clinton, the IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "The President using nearly $1 trillion dollars of stimulus money to fund his cronies?"
Bob: "No, the other one"
Jim: "You mean Fast & Furious?"
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim:
"I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million
low-information voters who don't pay taxes and get free stuff from
taxpayers and stuck us again with the most pandering, corrupt
administration in American history?"
Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE!"
...and let's not forget Obama's
use of a social security number that really belongs to a dead man, his Selective Service number fraud
and his
faked birth certificate (proven to be fake, with 'probable cause' established)
and lying to congress and the American people about it.
Here's the latest scandal:
Michelle Obama’s Princeton classmate is executive at company that built Obamacare website
10/25/2013