ONCE UPON A TIME IN WONDERLAND ... GEORGIA

 

ANOTHER HOLE PLUGGED BY TRUMP

TRUMP PLUGS ANOTHER (CLICK HERE >>>) HOLE ... COULD IT BE HE HAS PISSED OFF A LOT OF ELECTED OFFICIALS USING SIMILAR METHODS FOR PAYMENTS FROM FOREIGN POWERS

COVID-19 VIRUS 99.9% KILLED WHEN EXPOSED TO UV

COVID-19 DIES WHEN EXPOSED TO UV LED LIGHTS 

EXCUSE ME WHILE I THROW UP ... ANOTHER CITY OFF THE LIST!!!

 

Boston Removes Statue of Lincoln That Celebrated Emancipating Slaves — Because He Was White

Boston has removed a statue of Abraham Lincoln that celebrated the emancipation of slaves — simply because he was white.

The statue, called The Emancipation Memorial, featured a freed slave kneeling before Lincoln. It is a copy of the statue in Washington, DC, which Frederick Douglass spoke at the dedication of in 1876.

The bronze statue features an inscription that reads, “a race set free and the country at peace. Lincoln rests from his labors.”

The Boston Arts Commission voted to remove the statue in July, because people are offended that a black man would kneel before a white man. It was removed on Tuesday morning.

“After engaging in a public process, it’s clear that residents and visitors to Boston have been uncomfortable with this statue, and its reductive representation of the Black man’s role in the abolitionist movement,” Boston Mayor Marty Walsh (D) said in the statement at the time.

Democrats have been attempting to have the statue in DC removed as well.

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, a nonvoting member who represents DC, introduced a bill to remove that one as well.

“The designers of the Emancipation Statue in Lincoln Park in DC didn’t take into account the views of African Americans. It shows,” Norton wrote. “Blacks too fought to end enslavement. That’s why I’m introducing a bill to move this statue to a museum.”

Idiotic Black Lives Matter goons tried to rip it down in July, but failed.

ALL GREAT THINGS ARE SIMPLE BUT NOT SIMPLE

 Fitton: Hope for a Failed Election

Tom Fitton23 Dec 2020

Clear evidence is being exposed that the 2020 election was fatally compromised. The facts strongly suggest that Donald Trump won the election. But time is running out to set things right, and ensure it doesn’t happen again.

Major conservative and grassroots leaders stand behind a lawful election, I signed with them a statement that pushes back on the propaganda designed to make Americans accept failed elections:

The evidence overwhelmingly shows officials in key battleground states—as the result of a coordinated pressure campaign by Democrats and allied groups—violated the Constitution, state and federal law in changing mail-in voting rules that resulted in unlawful and invalid certifications of Biden victories.

There is no doubt President Donald J. Trump is the lawful winner of the presidential election.

This week the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee opened hearings on the tainted election, taking testimony from election security experts and first-hand witnesses to fraud from contested states. “The fraud happened,” Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said. “The election in many ways was stolen.”

Dirty voter rolls were and have been a major problem. A September Judicial Watch study revealed there are 1.8 million excess, or ‘ghost’ voters in 353 counties across 29 states. In contested Fulton county Georgia, there was a voter 109% registration rate – that is, more names on the rolls than eligible voting age citizens. Similar problems were uncovered in Pennsylvania, Nevada and Michigan, among other states.

Rushed through mail-in voting rules negated almost every state voter ID law in which they were used. These rules – most court-ordered – violated the Constitution and allowed illicit votes to be counted, almost entirely to the benefit of Joe Biden. Such last-minute rule changes by courts and executive authorities were the substance of the challenge Texas brought to the Supreme Court, which refused to address the serious constitutional issues raised by Texas.

In fact, most courts, including the Supreme Court, have dodged the substantive matter of the failed elections. Of course, sometimes the mask slips a bit, such as when Wisconsin state Supreme Court Justice Jill Karofsky went on a rant about challenging 220,000 fraudulent votes being “racism” and “un-American” and how Republican attorneys were supposedly asking the court to “overturn this election so that your king can stay in power.” This is the type of anti-Trump bias that has resulted in courts sounding more like MSNBC pundits than jurists.

When it comes to voter fraud most liberals are simply in denial. Mainstream media outlets routinely call the fraud charges “baseless” regardless of the mountains of evidence. The left believes that they can gaslight Joe Biden into the White House, in the same way they conducted a four-year Russian-sourced disinformation campaign against President Trump. As attorney Jesse Binnall said about the 130,000 unique instances of voter fraud in Nevada, the evidence had “never been refuted, only ignored.”

What next?  The Electoral College vote can be challenged under federal law and the United States Constitution. Republican electors in seven contested states cast alternate votes for Donald Trump to keep their legal options open. State legislatures retain their constitutional authority to offer alternative slates of electors. And Congress is the ultimate arbiter of the race since the ballot count can be contested during the joint session on January 6.

Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama has pledged to challenge the electors, and must be joined by at least one senator. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reportedly signaled to his caucus not to challenge election results. But Congress should not act as a rubber-stamp to a compromised presidential election.

If Brooks and one Senator object to certain state elector slates, then all bets are off.  On January 6, Republicans may control the Senate and have strength in the House. I’ve reviewed the law and political precedent closely and found that the law is confusing and precedent shaky. Combine this uncertainty with the intense outrage of tens of millions of voters who feel disenfranchised and one has the making for a less than certain affirmation of Biden’s “win” by Congress.

Again, just one Senator could step up and begin to change the course of history – and give us a second Trump term.

Tom Fitton is president of Judicial Watch, a nonprofit educational organization and a national leader in the effort to ensure fair and clean elections.

DID TRUMP RAISE OR LOWER THE BARR

 How The Barr DOJ Failed

“They’ve been protecting Hillary Clinton, they’ve been protecting Obama, they’ve been protecting the Deep State,” Fitton stated last Friday.

Attorney General Barr’s resignation amidst a contested presidential election dominated last week’s political airwaves. On Friday, Fitton reminded viewers that “AG Barr or at least the Justice Department under AG Barr has been a black hole in terms of responding to Judicial Watch.” As Fitton reported, “they recently went to court to shut down all of our Clinton email investigations, discovery, and FOIA lawsuits – they don’t want us to do anything.”

Fitton believes that the Justice Department has turned a blind eye to scandals surrounding VP Joe Biden, especially material evidence discovered on Hunter Biden’s laptop last year. The scandals, which he has described as “obvious criminal conduct,” were largely set aside by the Department of Justice, according to Fitton. “They [the DOJ] protected Joe Biden and interfered in the election by doing nothing about the Joe Biden scandals.”

Those defending the DOJ’s decision to not investigate the Bidens are, in Fitton’s estimation, misunderstanding the role the Agency plays in investigating corruption surrounding presidential candidates. While it is correct that the DOJ should not investigate candidates in a bid to influence the outcome of an election, Fitton believes that the Agency is doing just that – but in a different way: “this person is running for office and they get a get of jail free card.” Likening the policy to a game of Monopoly, Fitton contrasts this approach with that employed by the DOJ against President Trump, when “they specifically targeted Trump because he was running for office.” 

As Fitton concluded, “it doesn’t matter who the next AG is, I don’t expect any difference coming January. We just have to keep doing the work we’re doing. We can’t trust them to investigate Biden, so we’ll do it instead.”

FAUX FOX A CARCUS GIVING WAY TO SOCIAL ENTROPY

TALKING HEADS, SCRIPT READERS, SMARTPHONES AND SMART SPEAKERS AND JEFFERY TOOBINS... NOTHING OF THE SORT - MERE ECHOES OF EMPTINESS IN A DESERT OF MIS-INFORMATION AND QUASI-KNOWLEDGE AS IT BECOMES A PAINTED DESERT OF COMMERICALISM DEVOID OF LIFE!

CAN YOU ID THOSE INVOLVED IN VOTER FRAUD

 

Georgia Secretary of State Goes After Signature Audit in Every Single County

December 26, 2020

The drive to coverup the fraud of the 2020 election is still underway in every state and county. The contested states that took the light over the past several weeks are all wishing it would go away.

But the push for the truth continues because people want to know that the election process is fair and secure. And now that there is one state left in the front of everyone’s mind, there is deep concern that the Democrats will try again to prove that they can manipulate elections.

The threat of fraud in the Georgia run-off election is real. Ample warnings have been issued to people trying to vote out of state to influence the outcome. The Democrats miscalculated their totals in Georgia, and now they need to cheat again to control the Senate. But they are being watched to the point that they cannot get their act together.

Secretary of State Brand Raffensperger of Georgia is taking the matter seriously. He first ordered a signature review audit of ballots in Cobb County to ascertain if the allegations floating around were true. And now that the audit is over, he wants to see the entire state audited.

He has ordered the audit of every county in the state of Georgia. Something has gotten Raffensperger’s attention. He maintains that the audit ensures that future elections are secure, but the country helps but sees how it will affect the 2020 election.

The press notification that was released stated that “Secretary Raffensperger has asked researchers at the University of Georgia’s School of Public and International Affairs to conduct research, including a randomized signature match study of election materials handled at the county level in the November 3 Presidential contest.  This work will also include research on processes used at the county level to perform signature-matching.”

The media has played their cards and stated that signature matching could not be done because nothing compares to the signatures. Supposing that to be true, then Georgia has nothing to compare signatures with. The fact is that there are signatures available to be audited, and the media has been lying through its teeth the entire time.

Raffensperger and the Georgia governor have long tried to keep this kind of an audit from taking place. The president urged them weeks ago to get it done, but they dragged their feet until now. Something is eating at their conscience, knowing that evil took them by surprise, and they do not want to admit that they failed to take adequate precautions to protect the Georgian voter.

Now Raffensperger saved face when he mentioned that the election process in Georgia is secure. He stated that he is very “confident that elections in Georgia are secure, reliable, and effective. Despite endless lawsuits and wild allegations from Washington, D.C. pundits, we have seen no actual evidence of widespread voter fraud, though we are investigating all credible reports.”

Raffensperger still has a closed mind about the possibility that, under his watch, massive amounts of fraud took place. He is more concerned about his position and job than doing the right thing.

Something has happened in America that is precisely what the liberals want to see happen. They do not want patriots to stand up and fight for what is right like President Trump has done for the past four years. Because they know that the minute it happens on a large scale that their plans for destroying America are going to fall apart. And they will be branded as traitors.

Rocky Raffensperger stated that the audit will be done by the University of Georgia and will involve “a sample of signed envelopes in each county from the presidential election.” And it “is intended to be forward-looking, helping to inform and optimize election administration for future electoral contests in the State of Georgia.”

Raffensperger knows full well that the only way to prove that the election is secure and safe for future elections is to audit every signature. But he knows that the fraud would be exposed, and he cannot take the risk of losing his job. He is not is willing to do what is right and protect freedom. He is more concerned with his state of affairs.

PELOSI'S LITTLE RED BOOK HAS ALL THE NAMES

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

SUPREME COURT IS THE LAST STOP ON THE HIGHWAY TO SECESSION

 WHOA! WASN'T THIS TRIED ONCE BEFORE ... YUP!!! IT WAS AND OVER 600,000 THOUSAND DIED AND SECESSION FAILED ... OR DID IT?

THAT WAS THEN THIS IS NOW ... WHAT'S DIFFERENT? THERE ARE 74,000,000 MILLION THAT'S WHATS DIFFERENT!

NOTHIN' TO SEE HERE MOVE ON ...

 

Pollster Lists 18 Reasons Why The 2020 Presidential Election Is Deeply Puzzling

by K. Walker | Nov 30, 2020 | U.S. News

2020 election is deeply puzzling 

Are you still scratching your head on the 2020 election results? You’re not alone.  Patrick Basham, a pollster with the Democracy Institute, wrote an article for The Spectator U.S., citing some deeply puzzling things about the 2020 presidential election.

Here are a few of the things that Basham found strange. None of these questions prove anything. They don’t mean President Trump won the election, but they don’t mean he didn’t. We also don’t know if these strange facts were purposely created or were a result of the actual vote. What we do know is these questions need answers, and the sources need to be identified.

1. President Trump gained 11 million votes in 2020. This was the third-largest rise in support for an incumbent in American history. The left’s Messiah, Barack Obama, was comfortably re-elected in 2012 with 3.5 million fewer votes than he received in 2008.
2. To the chagrin of the NeverTrumpers, Trump received 95% of the GOP vote.
3. Trump also did well with Catholics, who cast their ballots for the man with the golden comb-over at a higher rate than they did in 2020.
4. Trump did extremely well with White, blue-collar male voters.
5. Trump expanded his support among minority voters. He grew his support among Black voters by 50 percent over 2016. Biden’s support dropped below “well below 90 percent” among Black voters, which is normally the threshold for a Democratic candidate to win.
6. Trump saw his support in the Hispanic community grow by two-thirds to more than four-in-ten.
7. Democrats’ lack of down-ballot support.  Victorious presidential challengers, especially challengers, usually have votes supporting down-ballot candidates, but Joe did not.
8. The inconsistency in polls and non-polling metrics before the election. Polls have been wrong in recent years, but, despite that, they have an 80 percent accuracy rate. Non-polling metrics include: party registrations, considering the candidates’ primary vote share, candidate enthusiasm, social media following, online searches, number of donors, and the number of people betting on candidates, and those have been 100 percent accurate. But not in this election. They were all wrong.

Also, in his article, Basham cited these 10 things that don’t have a satisfactory explanation.

1. Late on election night, with Trump comfortably ahead, many swing states stopped counting ballots. In most cases, observers were removed from the counting facilities. Counting generally continued without the observers.
2. Statistically, abnormal vote counts were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large in size (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio.
3. Late arriving ballots were counted. In Pennsylvania, 23,000 absentee ballots have impossible postal return dates, and another 86,000 have such extraordinary return dates they raise serious questions.
4. The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail-in ballot envelopes, which must contain signatures.
5. Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting. Such is Biden’s narrow margin that, as political analyst Robert Barnes observes, “If the states simply imposed the same absentee ballot rejection rate as recent cycles, then Trump wins the election.”
6. Missing votes. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 50,000 votes held on 47 USB cards are missing.
7. Non-resident voters. Matt Braynard’s Voter Integrity Project estimates that 20,312 people who no longer met residency requirements cast ballots in Georgia. Biden’s margin is 12,670 votes.
8. “Overvotes.” Pennsylvania mailed out 1.8 million ballots, but 2.5 million ballots were returned. In 10 Pennsylvania counties, Biden secured more votes than there were registered Democratic voters. In Nevada, there are 77,982 more votes in the presidential election than total ballots cast; Biden’s current margin is 33,596. Ballots exceeded the number of residents by 2.5 times in some Georgia precincts.
9. Serious “chain of custody” breakdowns. Invalid residential addresses. Record numbers of dead people voting. Ballots in pristine condition without creases, that is, they had not been mailed in envelopes as required by law.
10. Statistical anomalies. In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simply a human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened.