Saturday, August 31, 2024

FIGHT!, FIGHT!, FIGHT! … JOY IS NOT A STRATEGY A DELUSION WRAPPED IN A ILLUSION

 

Dr. Malone Endorses Trump: Here’s Why

This article originally appeared on malone.news and was republished with permission.

Guest post by Dr. Robert Malone

The time of choosing is coming soon.

Now it comes down to this — a straightforward choice.

Trump/Vance or Harris/Walz.

I have wholeheartedly endorsed what I hope will be future President Trump. I have done this of my free will, in response to no request, being neither coerced nor enticed nor seeking favor or some future direct benefit.

I do this without reservation, knowing he is not perfect, has made mistakes, and will make more.

I am also profoundly aware that I am not a perfect man. I have made mistakes and will make more mistakes in the future. When I do, I will do my best to apologize, make amends, and seek forgiveness for my transgressions or damage done to another.

But I have not been President of the United States nor faced the terrible burden of large-scale life-and-death decisions. Nor have I had to face the outrageous barrage of hypnotized and weaponized hate that he has withstood.

Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured unto you. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me cast out the mote out of thine eye; and lo, the beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast your pearls before the swine, lest haply they trample them under their feet, and turn and rend you.

Matthew 7:1

You can argue around and around about Operation Warp Speed and the jab, but you still face the same decision.

Do you choose freedom or the illusion of a transiently safe, “equality of outcomes” Orwellian future for yourself and your children? Are you willing to compromise freedom for what, in the tide of human affairs, is but a mote?

The prior administration of Donald Trump did not impose the “vaccine” mandates, but the Biden-Harris administration did.

Donald Trump’s administration rejected the WHO. The Biden-Harris administration reinstated WHO funding and developed and promoted the WHO sovereignty-destroying “pandemic treaty” and “International Health Accord” updates.

The administration of Donald Trump did not deploy years of COVID-related psychological bioterrorism and disaster cronyism in the US and the world, but the Biden-Harris administration did.

The administration of Donald Trump did not conspire with and coerce corporate media and big tech to censor, propagandize, and deploy a myriad of military-grade psychological warfare methods and weapons on US citizens. The Biden-Harris administration did.

The administration of Donald Trump did not arbitrarily and capriciously abandon allies, advanced equipment and US Soldiers in Afghanistan. The Biden-Harris administration did.

The administration of Donald Trump did not prosecute, capitalize, and propagandize an unnecessary war in Ukraine to advance global imperialist objectives. The Biden-Harris administration did.

The administration of Donald Trump did not sacrifice and cripple European populations and industry at the alter of its Ukrainian fantasies. The Biden-Harris administration was complicit in blowing up the Nordstream pipelines and then deployed propaganda to prevent discussion or consequences for its illegal aggression.

The administration of Donald Trump took multiple specific actions to reduce illegal immigration. The Biden-Harris administration actively facilitated unlawful immigration.

The Trump administration did not jail domestic political opponents or otherwise weaponize the government and the judiciary. The Biden-Harris administration has honed that banana republic strategy into an art form.

The Trump administration did not actively pit Americans against Americans. The Biden-Harris administration cynically did so to gain a short-term advantage during a midterm election.

I can provide example after example to make this point.

Harris-Walz, like Biden-Harris before them, like Obama-Biden before that, actively promote and support the “New World Order” and ”Great Reset”. They have acted to enforce this by the development and deployment of a massive, global #PsyWar censorship-industrial complex. In fact, after leaving office, Obama became one of the leading advocates for the suppression of free speech.

In contrast, Donald Trump has consistently taken on the propaganda and lying, which is characteristic of modern corporate media throughout the Western world.

Harris-Walz clearly support the further development of a Marxist Surveillance state in which both the first and second amendment of the US Bill of Rights are to be considered optional and negotiable.

Four or more years under a Harris-Walz administration will place all freedom-loving people under the yoke of a Woke, social engineering nightmare that will tear our society and nation apart, sap our energy, and destroy our productivity and innovative spirit.

Four or more years of a Harris-Walz administration will be the last phase before transitioning North America to submitting to a poseur, self-appointed “one world government” led by WEF/UN and supported by a network of global public-private partnerships.

This new self-appointed, unelected socialist-corporatist global governance will prosecute more forever wars as it seeks to defeat any State that does not buy into its socialist-corporatist (Fascist) Great Reset/New World Order.

This decision is not subtle. Do not let the trolls and chaos agents convince you otherwise with their constant siren calls of “what about this” and “what about that”. Look deeper. Who are these anonymous avatars that are constantly sowing seeds of doubt? They are almost always low complexity, low connectivity bots and trolls. They manipulate your thoughts and drain your commitment. Synthetic false flag operators whispering in your ear, seeking to either cause you to doubt your own intuition, or to dissuade you from acting, dissuade you from voting.

Are they people that you have known and interacted with for these past years? And if not, is there an indication that they have in some way passed independent validation as actual humans?

Focus on the big picture. Do not be distracted by the manufactured noise.

Please listen to me. Be aware that you are now surrounded by an active psychological warfare battle zone. You are constantly subjected to efforts to manipulate what information you are allowed to see, what voices you are allowed to hear, and what feelings you are allowed to feel. It has become extremely difficult to distinguish friend from foe and truth from lies.

Your only guide is your mind and soul, your conscience, and perhaps the council of the few you know -based on years of experience- will speak truthfully to you. Be still. Listen to that internal voice. It will tell you what is real and what is fake. It is your best guide for navigating this modern surreal psychological battlefield where the chattering of posers and false flag operations constantly bombard you.


I am reminded of the words of fellow Virginian Patrick Henry. Some may wish to skip this section, but others may find it relevant to the present.

The weapons deployed to threaten us differ, but the purpose and intent are the same.

Over time, the face of totalitarianism has been hidden behind many masks. Technology is only the most recent. But always, under the mask, is what JRR Tolkien named Mordor.

Drawing from the official Colonial Williamsburg historic record:

To avoid interference from Governor Dunmore, the Second Virginia Convention met March 20, 1775 inland at Richmond — in what is now called St. John’s Church — instead of the Capitol in Williamsburg. Delegate Patrick Henry presented resolutions to raise and establish a militia and put Virginia in a defense position. Henry’s opponents urged caution and patience until the crown replied to Congress’ latest petition for reconciliation.

On the 23rd, Henry proposed organizing a volunteer cavalry or infantry company in every Virginia county. By custom, Henry addressed himself to the Convention’s president, Peyton Randolph of Williamsburg. Henry’s words were not transcribed, but no one who heard them forgot their eloquence or Henry’s closing words, which ring in the soul of free men just as clearly today as they did then:

“Give me liberty, or give me death!”

St. John’s Church, Richmond, Virginia

MARCH 23, 1775

MR. PRESIDENT: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself guilty of treason towards my country and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves, and the House? Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled, that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask, gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done, to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free, if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!

I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!


I have a stubborn streak of Scots-Irish in me. My ancestors were from the deep South. Those who know me, have listened to me, and have walked beside me know that I will not back down from bullies. It is both a strength and a weakness. But it is deep in my soul, an essential part of who I am.

It is true that I am a fighter. And so is Donald Trump. In these dark times, we need a President who is a fighter, who has experienced the outrageous slings and arrows, survived, and does not back down.

I don’t back down, and neither does Donald Trump. I recognize what that means and what it takes, and I respect that.

Don’t tread on me. Do not take my freedom or that of my friends or those I love; you will face the consequences. I may not be very big, but I use my strengths effectively. When I get harmed, I fight back, either getting even or going down trying.

I recognize those qualities in Donald Trump. At the root of it, these are the qualities I am looking for in a leader I can respect and follow. A battle-hardened President who can gird his loins with the overturning of Chevron Deference, wield a flaming sword called “Schedule F,” negotiate peace backed by strength with Russia, and take on both the Administrative State and the new Globalist World Order.

As I travel all over the Western world, I encounter populist center-right leaders who look to President Trump with hope and for leadership. Most see this US election as pivotal.

We must resist Marxist-Socialism, neo-Malthusianism AND transhumanism with everything we have for the sake of our families, culture, children and humanity. And we need a leader that can help us fight that battle.

This is not subtle. There is only one choice.

Give me liberty, or give me death.

Copyright 2024 Dr Robert Malone

Thursday, August 29, 2024

ILL-FORMED KNOWLEDGE YIELDS ILL-FORMED POLICIES

 

No, Kamala you can't campaign against yourself, There is no Profit-Driven Inflation … YOU KNOW NOT WHAT YOU LIP-SYNC!

Kamala’s Destructive Economic Policies, Screenshot from YouTube: “Good, Bad, and Ugly: Analyzing Kamala Harris’ DNC Speech,” The Majority Report w/ Sam, August 28, 2024.

As someone with a degree in Misesian (Austrian) economics, I find that Kamala Harris has given me an unlimited supply of ill-informed economic policies to tear apart. Take, for instance, her proposed ban on grocery price gouging. Such a policy is almost certain to lead to shortages, as it disrupts the natural market mechanisms that balance supply and demand. Moreover, the concept of “profit-driven inflation” is fundamentally flawed. Inflation is not caused by corporate greed but is, in fact, a monetary phenomenon. The real culprit behind inflation is the Biden administration’s reckless expansion of the money supply, soaring debt, and excessive government spending.

The M2 money supply—which includes cash, checking deposits, and easily convertible near money—has ballooned UNDER BIDEN/HARRIS ADMINISTRATION. In 2019, the M2 money supply was approximately $15.4 trillion. By 2024, it had surged to around $21.02 trillion, representing an increase of nearly 36%. This unprecedented growth in the money supply is the primary driver of the inflation we’re experiencing today, not the actions of individual companies.

The basic law of supply and demand tells us that when supply increases while demand remains the same, prices go down. The same principle applies to money. When the government prints more money, the value of each dollar—its buying power—decreases. This is why your grocery bills are much higher now than they were under Trump.

Kamala’s proof of price gouging relies on a questionable calculation that she believes shows milk producers increased prices beyond the decades-high inflation created by the Biden/Harris administration. First off, production quantities are set months in advance of when products will be sold. As a result, prices are set based on expectations about future inflation. So, while inflation may have been 5% when production was underway, analysts rightly anticipated that inflation would be higher by the time the products reached the market, and therefore, they set the prices accordingly.

The reason socialism fails is because governments are backward-looking, while companies have to be forward-looking. The government, after the fact, has the benefit of perfect data and no skin in the game. They then analyze retrospectively the actions of corporations and decide what the companies did wrong. Another issue with the government is that they intentionally use limited information to arrive at a desired narrative. For example, when they claimed gasoline companies made record profits in the second year of the pandemic, they ignored the fact that these same companies suffered incredible losses in the first year of the pandemic because no one was driving. The companies average those gains and losses and arrive at a normal average profit. The Kamalites, however, just look at the gains, ignore the losses, and claim higher-than-usual profits.

Capping prices and forcing companies to sell at a price lower than what they believe the market price should be will inevitably result in shortages. Companies will simply stop producing a product if the government forces them to sell it at a price lower than the cost plus a normal profit. Moreover, the government should not have the authority to determine what constitutes a “normal” profit because it lacks the detailed information that corporations gain through countless interactions between buyers and sellers, happening millions of times every day.

Another point the Biden/Harris White House misses is that profits were higher in nominal terms because of inflation. The number of dollars was higher than the previous year, but those dollars were worth less than before. So, when you take a normal 3-8% profit margin and multiply it by the 13% inflated dollars, you end up with a staggering number, which Kamala Harris and sleepy Joe claim was price gouging. In reality, it wasn’t price gouging—it was just the normal effects of inflation.

When oil prices go up, the price of everything else follows.  Joe Biden’s approach of insulting Saudi Arabia and refusing to engage with them as Trump did caused oil prices to rise. Add to this the Biden/Harris flation factor, and costs skyrocketed. To stay in business, companies had to charge prices that covered the added costs from Biden/Harris’ policies plus a normal profit margin, which, once again, resulted in big, scary numbers. Kamala Harris response was to raise the minimum wage, which accounts for 20%-40% of prices. So, raising the minimum wage further increased prices …

Getting back to the milk example Kamala Harris is harping on: Her portrayal is that big, greedy, Republican-voting milk companies gouged the price of milk because they supposedly hate children and families and want kids to underperform in school for some reason. According to this narrative, the milk companies all spontaneously decided to call each other and say, “Let’s raise the price of milk really high.” And apparently, they chose this exact moment in history to do it because, for some reason, they had never thought of it before.

If the narrative that big, evil corporations raised prices out of greed were true, then it should also be true that nice, kind, children-loving, Democrat-voting farmers and small milk producers would be selling milk at a lower price. However, if you look at prices at big-box stores like Target and Walmart, everything, including milk, is actually cheaper than at mom-and-pop stores. This shows that the antitrust narrative falls apart. Big-box stores, large producers, and commercial farms end up dominating the sector because they are more efficient and can sell goods cheaper than small producers. If this weren’t the case, small producers would enter the market, sell at lower prices, and make more money—but they can’t.

Kamala Harris' economic policies are the exact answers you’d get from a five-year-old. If you ask a child, “Milk is really expensive, what should the government do?” your kid might say, “The government should make them sell it cheaper.” As much as you love your children, you probably don’t let them make major decisions for your family. It would be just as misguided to have them write national economic policies.

THE TAIL THAT WAGS THE REST OF THE MEDIA INDUSTRIAL DOG

 

AND THE PELOSI PROXY — HARRIS!

THIS IS DISGUSTING

 

Radicals on streets in Washington D.C. BURNED THE AMERICAN FLAG.

 

They painted “HAMAS IS COMING” on Monuments in D.C.

 

THEY STORMED A GOVERNMENT BUILDING.

 

The FBI got involved when Patirotis walked through the Capitol on January 6th. 

 

When TERRORIST DEFACE WASHINGTON D.C., NOTHING HAPPENS.

 

This shows you who the BIDEN/HARRIS Democrats are. 

 

THEY ARE OK WITH RADICALS, THEY HATE AMERICA, THEY HATE CHRISTIANS, THEY HATE JEWS. 

 

THE BIDEN/HARRIS DEMOCRATS ARE ALLOWING TERRORISTS TO ROAM OUR STREETS. 

 

Please stand with us. 

 

FIGHT BACK. 

 


DONATE TO HELP LOCAL REPUBLICANS GET IN POWER THIS NOVEMBER. 

 

Sign the petition to


DEMAND THE DEPORTATION of Radicals and Terrorists. 

Together, WE WILL EXPEL HAMAS and TERRORIST FROM THE USA


Wednesday, August 21, 2024

FROM ONE IMBIBED TO ANOTHER AND ANOTHER AND ANOTHER

Nancy Pelosi defends herself over speculated Biden beef: ‘I did what I had to’

NOW JOE ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS RESIGN SO KAMALA CAN MAKE ME THE VICE-PRESIDENT FOR THE BALANCE OF THE TERM

Declining to confirm whether or not she has spoken with Biden, 81, since he dropped out last month, Pelosi (D-Calif.), 81, contended that she did what was necessary.

“Sometimes you have to take a punch for the children,” she told CNN Monday. “I did what I had to do.”

“My concern was not about the president, it was about his campaign,” she added, before implying that Vice President Kamala Harris ushered in “exuberance” and “excitement.”

She then grew uncomfortable with the line of questioning, blurting out, “Why are we even talking about it?”

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi walks the floor on the opening night of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) at the United Center in Chicago.
Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi walks the floor on the opening night of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) at the United Center in Chicago. JUSTIN LANE/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Monday night was intended to be Biden’s time to shine and feature a “passing the baton” (THE STICKY END) from him to Harris. Biden is then set to jet off to California for a reported vacation. 

YOU WANT A FRIEND GET A DOG … OH YEAH, JOE HAS A DOG BUT IT BITES EVERYONE … NOW WHAT SHOULD JOE GET … NANCY SUGGESTS "GET LOST"!

Pelosi and Biden have a decades long history together in politics. But after his fumbling debate performance against former President Donald Trump in late June, friction appeared to emerge in their relationship. 

Initially, Pelosi defended Biden. Then about two days after Biden penned a letter to Democrats telling them that he was “firmly committed” to staying in the race, she made a startling appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” rumored to be one of the president’s favorite shows. 

DNC = DOES NOT COUNT … PRIMARY VOTERS WISHES ARE MERELY PART OF THE NEW DEFINITION OF HOPE AND CHANGE … 

“It’s up to the president to decide if he is going to run,” Pelosi said on the program. “We’re all encouraging him to make the right decision because time is running short.” However, we will be encouraging him in the next fews days what the "right decision" is as I see it!

Such remarks draw attention as she publicly suggested his decision on staying in the race was an open question, despite Biden saying it was not.

Joe Biden DNC
President Joe Biden speaks onstage during the first day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center on August 19, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois. Getty Images

“I never called one person. I kept true to my word. Any conversation I had, it was just going to be with him. I never made one call. They said I was burning up the lines, I was talking to Chuck [Schumer]. I didn’t talk to Chuck at all,” Pelosi previously told The New Yorker.

She later admitted that others called her. 

Pelosi also previously told The New Yorker that she’s “never been that impressed with his political operation,” without elaborating. 

Seemingly seeking to patch things up with Biden, Pelosi has done a multitude of interviews with the stated intent of promoting her new book in which she’s buttered him up with praise, suggesting that he deserved to be on Mount Rushmore and that she wasn’t concerned about his mental acuity. 

Biden hasn’t talked much about Pelosi in the public eye, though he did name-drop her when explaining that the mutiny against him motivated him to drop out. 

“A number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was going to hurt them in the races. And I was concerned if I stayed in the race, that would be the topic — you’d be interviewing me about why did Nancy Pelosi say [something],” he told “CBS News Sunday Morning” earlier this month. 

Earlier on CNN, Biden’s longtime former adviser Anita Dunn, who has since departed the White House briefly opined on the Pelosi situation. 

“Nobody wants to have a fight with Nancy Pelosi at this time because we’re a united party and we’re going to be moving forward,” she told CNN, glossing over the rumored feud.