Friday, September 30, 2022

NO-JABS, LO-JABS, HIJABS, NOT THE VACCINE

 

Sarsour, Omar, and Tlaib Remain Silent on Iran Protests

Linda Sarsour, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib always have a lot to say about Israel’s “oppression” of the Palestinians. It’s the topic that obsesses them, and Tlaib has even laid down the law, declaring that no one can call himself or herself a “progressive” if he or she refuses to condemn Israel. It is not one’s position on global warming, on tax policy, an abortion, that for Tlaib defines a progressive. The sine qua non of a true progressive, according to Rashida Tlaib, is unrelenting hostility toward the Jewish state, of the kind that Sarsour, Omar, and Tlaib express with such fury.

Meanwhile, in the real world, it is the Palestinians themselves who indeed suffer from oppression, but not from the Israelis. It is their own leaders, ruthless and corrupt, who make their lives miserable. In Gaza, Hamas rules with an iron fist, and anyone who dares to challenge the terror group’s rule will be arrested; some will be tortured; others will be tortured and killed. Hamas rulers are famously corrupt; just two of them, Khaled Meshaal and Mousa Abu Marzouk, have each acquired fortunes of $2.5 billion. The Palestinians they rule over eke out miserable existences, save for the lucky ones who are allowed to work in Israel, where they receive salaries ten times as large as what they would be paid in Gaza.

And the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank is just as oppressive. It is a dictatorship that pretends to be a democracy. The last elections were held in 2005. Since then Mahmoud Abbas, President of the P.A., has ruled by fiat; as many like to point out, he is now entering the 17th year of his four-year term. And he’s no slouch when it comes to corruption, either. The family fortune he has built with his two sons Tarek and Yasser comes to $400 million. Those who dare to criticize Abbas find themselves losing their government jobs or being sentenced to jail for undermining the state. His most effective critic, Nizar Banat, was silenced by being beaten to death by Abbas’ goons.

Neither the Hamas leaders, nor Mahmoud Abbas and his cronies, have ever been criticized by Sarsour, Omar, and Tlaib. Such criticism, they no doubt feel, would merely confuse people and would divert their attention from the true villain in the Middle East, the state of Israel.

Nothing shows up the hypocrisy of the Tlaib-Sarsour-Omar trio than their near-total silence about the massive suppression of protesters who have dared to defy the authorities in 90 cities across Iran. They were initially prompted to a furious response by the torture and killing of a young Kurdish woman, Mahsa Amini, who had been arrested by the Morality Police for not having affixed her hijab correctly. At the time, she was not even publicly visible; she had been riding in a car with her family. Three days after Amini was arrested, she was dead, with wounds on her face and body that suggested torture. First in Tehran and in the Kurdish lands, and then across Iran, crowds came out to protest. They were mainly led by women, who defied the government by tearing off their hijabs and setting them on fire. The first slogan shouted was “women, life, freedom,” but soon enough, the focus shifted from the mistreatment of women by the Morality Police to another target – the regime itself. The crowds have now been chanting “Death to the Islamic Republic” and “Death to the Dictator” (the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei).

Yet all during these weeks of protests across Iran, there was only silence from Omar, Tlaib, and Sarsour. It is strange that Linda Sarsour, one of the organizers of the Women’s March, had so little to say about the women of Iran, and especially, had nothing of her own to say about the killing of Mahsa Amini, or about the killings of other Iranian women since. Sarsour has never spoken out about the Morality Police forcing Iranian women to wear the hijab “in the proper manner.” She had nothing to say during the last two weeks in September about the thousands of women removing their hijabs and destroying them, in an act of defiance aimed at the Iranian authorities, nor about the beatings they received from the police.

A report on the sudden silence of the normally noisy Omar, Tlaib, and Sarsour can be found here: “Why Haven’t Linda Sarsour, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib Even Mentioned Iran’s Hijab Protests?,” by Phyllis Chesler, Algemeiner, September 28, 2022:

As of this writing, heartbreakingly brave Iranian women have been protesting for 10 days and nights in the streets of at least 80 cities [now 90]. They are risking death for the right not to wear the hijab. Women have been burning their hijabs and cutting their hair. They’ve been heard chanting “Women, Life, and Freedom,” and “Death to the dictator.”

The Iranian mullahs have unleashed the Revolutionary Guard and paramilitary (Basij) forces against the protestors. They have been dragging women by their hair, banging their heads on the ground, tear-gassing, beating, shooting, arresting, and murdering them. Fatality estimates range from 50-400 protesters and bystanders.

These protests were sparked by the Sept. 16 death — in morality police custody — of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish Iranian woman. She was apprehended while in a car with her family because she was, allegedly, wearing her hijab incorrectly. While the police denied beating or torturing her to death, a photo of Amini in a hospital bed reveals her bloodied face. She was in a coma.

Eyewitnesses saw Amini being beaten as she was shoved into the back of a police van by the Morality Police. No doubt that was merely a warm-up to the much stronger blows she received later on, both when she was inside the van and then inside the prison cell where she was kept for three days.

Pro-government demonstrators also have been out in force, defaming the women and their male supporters as “Israel’s soldiers,” and shouting “Death to Israel,” and “Death to America.” The government has blacked out the Internet and arrested journalists.

After a few days of protest, the government ordered pro-government demonstrators to “spontaneously” come out onto the streets to denounce the protesters and express their support for the government and the Morality Police. Women in black chadors did as they were told, but were far outnumbered, to the regime’s chagrin, by the protesters.

It is obscene that the Palestinian-American activist Linda Sarsour and US Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashia Tlaib (D-MI) have failed to say anything about these brave Iranian women, let alone offer their moral support.

Sarsour and Omar continue to glorify their wearing of the hijab as a protest against white racism and alleged “Islamophobia.”

When will this trio condemn the mad mullahs and their murderous morality police?

Tlaib retweeted a “solidarity” statement from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who wrote that “the right to choose belongs to us all, from hijabs to reproductive care.”

Sarsour retweeted another statement against “forced hijab” by a lawyer, Azadeh Shahshahani.

Omar retweeted “To be (hijabi) or not (hijabi) is the business of no state or man” by Yasmin Abdel-Magied.

But why can’t Sarsour, Omar, and Tlaib speak in their own voices at a press conference? Or in Congress?

None of the three women offered their own words in support of the protesters. They merely retweeted the briefest of remarks by others. All three, who are ordinarily so vocal, were suddenly tongue-tied.

When will these high-profile professional defenders of Muslims decide that Muslim women are also worthy of defending? When will they hold Muslim men — who are mis-using or using the Koran to terrify and subordinate Muslim women — accountable?…

Twelve years ago, I did not argue for banning the hijab. It does not obscure one’s identity, although, in the West, it can still set one apart from others depending on how large, dark, unfriendly, or “forbidding” the hijab is.

However, in Mahsa Amini’s honor, I am rethinking that position. As long as one woman anywhere can be harassed, beaten, arrested, or murdered because her hijab has slipped or is seen as improperly worn, Western women, including highly visible activists and politicians like Sarsour and Omar, should consider voluntarily ditching their hijabs. When all women are free to wear or not to wear a head-covering — then, and only then, might women choose what is right for them.

According to the author, Phyllis Chesler, at this point, in order to most tellingly express solidarity with the women protesters in Iran, even women in the West who wear the hijab should consider “ditching” it in protest. Not forever, she says, but only until Muslim women have attained the right not to wear it.

Tens of thousands of protesters have been willing to risk death – up to 400 have been killed so far by the police in the latest demonstrations– in order to transform the vast prison that Iran has been for the last 43 years, ever since Ayatollah Khomeini came to power and Iran became a theocracy run by fanatical clerics.

In a personal interview, my esteemed colleague, Ibn Warraq, points out: “The protesters lack leadership and above all they lack weapons.”

Ibn Warraq also points out that “At some point the army would have to flip, refuse to kill their own people.”

Is this possible? Can it ever happen? Are a people who were able to drive out the Shah also capable of driving out Khomeini’s mullahs? That is the question.

For all its very serious faults, including using the American flag to fashion a hijab for the marchers, Sarsour was part of a Women’s March leadership that drew hundreds of thousands of people. Tlaib and Omar have run multiple successful campaigns.

Imagine if they applied their organizational skills to rallying Americans to take to the streets in support the heroic Iranian women and men who are risking their lives for the freedoms we enjoy in America.

It could show the Iranians that we stand with them, and that moral support might help keep them going. Sadly, we are unlikely to find out.

Chesler recognizes – though she clearly despises their views – the organizational abilities of Sarsour, as an organizer of the Women’s March, and of Omar and Tlaib, who have each run two successful campaigns for Congress. Those abilities could be put to use in organizing demonstrations in this country that would provide moral support to the Iranian protesters. But that won’t happen, she concludes, because neither Sarsour, Omar, nor Tlaib will do more than the minimum – each offering only a single retweeting of someone else’s comment on the current mass protests and repression in Iran, but no statements of their own. After all, none of them wants Americans to start taking the side of those who are being oppressed by Islam, including Muslim women; that would divert attention that must be focused, laser-like, on the sins committed by the Jewish state. And such a deflection of attention away from Israel, for Omar, Tlaib, and Sarsour the source of all evil in the region and even beyond, would never do.


HIJABS ... NO HELL GOT MY HEAD COVERED UP

DR. ROBERT W. MALONE MD, BEING ROASTED BY THE LEFT ...

 

FREDDIE KRUGER IS STOCKING HIS FALL-OUT SHELTER AS WE SPEAK!

 

Tucker Carlson: Biden admin ‘may have blown up’ gas pipelines in Baltic Sea

‘Blow up the Nord Stream pipelines? Okay, we’ve entered a new phase. One in which the United States is directly at war with the largest nuclear power in the world.’

Featured Image
 Fox News/YouTube

(LifeSiteNews) – Tucker Carlson strongly insinuated on his show on Tuesday that the Biden administration may be responsible for blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea and that this would lead to war between the U.S. and Russia. 

“If they did this, it would be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has ever done, but it would also be totally consistent with what they do,”and this would mean that “the United States is directly at war with the largest nuclear power in the world,” according to Carlson. 

Detonations in the Baltic Sea on Monday, September 27, caused massive damage to the two major gas pipelines between Russia and Germany called Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2. Most experts believe that this was a deliberate, targeted attack on the pipelines. 

Carlson quoted Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki who called the incident an “act of sabotage.”

He ridiculed the mainstream media for speculating that Russian President Vladimir Putin is responsible for the attack and said “Vladimir Putin may be evil […] but is he stupid? Probably isn’t stupid.” 

Elaborating on his point that Russia would be an unlikely perpetrator, Carlson said that “If you are Vladimir Putin, you would have to be suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines,” and “Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth and most critically your leverage over other countries.  

Carlson went on to say that while blowing up Nord Stream does not help Vladimir Putin, other countries would have considered destroying the pipelines, citing President Joe Biden’s statements from this February. 

RELATED: US gov’t suspected of sabotaging major European gas pipeline after Biden threatened to ‘end’ it

“If Russia invades [Ukraine] […] then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it,” Biden said on camera in February. A reporter then asked the president how he would do that since the pipeline is under Germany’s control. Biden responded by saying: “I promise you we’ll be able to do it.” 

“And yet those watching, including us, didn’t take Biden seriously,” Carlson commented. “This is the president who declared climate change the most pressing emergency in the history of the world. […] Would that guy blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea? […] That would be an unimaginably reckless act. That would be the kind of thing that you would do if you wanted to start a nuclear war.” 

And yet, the Fox News host continued, “in retrospect, it’s obvious they were thinking about this,” since U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nulandsaid “pretty much the same thing. Nuland also “helped to engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government some years ago,” according to Carlson. 

Nuland made her remarks about Nord Stream 2 in January 2022: “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” 

RELATED: ‘Monumental provocation’: How US and international policy-makers deliberately baited Putin to war

Carlson called Nuland’s statements “chilling” when looking back at them now.

Even if “we don’t know for sure” that the U.S. government is responsible for this act, “we can tell you that close allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it,” the Fox News host also said. 

He referred to tweet posted by Radek Sikorskia former Polish Defense Minister and current member of the European Parliament. Sikorski posted a picture of the water surface above the gas leaks and wrote, “Thank you, USA.” 

Thank you, USA. pic.twitter.com/nALlYQ1Crb

— Radek Sikorski MEP (@radeksikorski) September 27, 2022

The Polish MEP added in another tweet“As we say in Polish, a small thing, but so much joy. #Nordstream,” expressing his delight over the destruction of the pipelines. In addition, he retweeted Biden’s comments from this February about bringing an end to Nord Stream 2. 

He [Sikorski] is chairman of the EU-US delegation in the European Parliament, he’s connected. He is also the husband of the regime’s stenographer, Anne Applebaum of the Atlantic magazine. He is so close to Joe Biden that he got a picture of the two of them in his Twitter profile,” Carlson asserted. 

The Fox News host continued by stating that the new Baltic Pipe” gas pipeline between Denmark and Poland was inaugurated on the same day that the Nord Stream incident occurred. Polish President Andrzej Duda said that the project would end the country’s dependence on Russian gas. 

“It is likely to do very well since now it has less competition. Making sense?” Carlson asked the audience regarding the Baltic Pipe. 

“If they did thisit would be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has ever done, but it would also be totally consistent with what they do,” Carlson stated. “What do they do? They destroy, these people build nothing […] instead they destroy, they desecrate, from historic statues, to the Constitution, to energy infrastructure.” 

Moreover, Carlson cited a $35 million spending bill advanced in the Senate the night of the incident which is meant “to prepare for and respond to potential nuclear and radiological incidents in Ukraine,” a further sign that the U.S. government may expect an escalation following the attack on the pipelines, according to the Fox News host. 

Carlson explained that, if the U.S. were in fact responsible for the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines, that would mean direct war between the U.S. and Russia: 

Every action has a reaction, equal and opposite. Blow up the Nord Stream pipelines? Okay, we’ve entered a new phase. One in which the United States is directly at war with the largest nuclear power in the world [Russia]. 

Carlson stated in his segment that “one of the great environmental catastrophes of our time is unfolding tonight off the coast of Denmark. […] Nord Stream 1 and 2 are pouring millions of cubic meters of natural gas into the Baltic Sea.” 

The Fox News anchor went on to talk about the possible impacts on the environment: 

You can only guess how many marine mammals are being killed right now. Countless! But the lasting damage may be to the atmosphere. Natural gas is comprised of up to 90% methane. […] So, if you are worried about climate change, what just happened to the Nord Stream pipelines is as close to the apocalypse as we have ever come. 

At the same time, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre claimed that the incident at the pipelines actually provides an opportunity for “moving to clean energy economy.” The Fox News anchor reacted to this by blasting the Biden administration for its blatant hypocrisy: 

 Oh, “moving to clean energy” say the people who very well may be responsible for letting methane into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere at a scale that most people can’t imagine. People lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time.

Carlson closed the segment by drawing a grim picture of the possible fallout of the pipeline attacks: 

If we blow up the Nord Stream pipeline, why wouldn’t Russia sever undersea internet cables? What would happen if banks in London could not communicate with banks in New York for one day […] What would the economic effect of that be? […] We could have an actual collapse. We could wind up very quickly in third-world conditions. Those are the stakes. Have the people behind this, the geniuses, like Victoria Nuland considered the effects? Maybe they have. Maybe that was the point.